Subject  | |
|---|
|
| | Your postings are anonymous unless you wish to indicate company affiliation. We want these postings to be technical in nature and peer reviewable. The information posted here will be used to guide the development of reference design. This is for technical input given the policy we have been dealt as desribed in the current Title 24 draft (in the shared document library). |
|
| |
|
| | Bummer - still no posts here! |
|
| |
|
| | It seems that moving files once they have been uploaded is a major pain in this system. What is the recommended procedure for such a thing? |
|
| |
|
| | I think standardizing the signal names, nomenclatures and colors for signals is a good idea provided that the application variations are taken into account such as in heat pump system Y signal in combination with O or B is used for both heating and cooling. The idea behind standardizing HVAC outputs on one connector (DB-25), as I understand it, is to make replacing one PCT with another one easier for... |
|
| |
|
| | It looks like the CEC will accept a compromise in the short term. That compromise involves defining a mandatory 5 terminal block with standard signals, another optional block for advanced systems, and a digital interface yet to be defined. Please review the new reference design document and comment. --Erich |
|
| |
 |